宗路平, 赵文飞, 王梦君, 张天星, 尹志坚. 国家公园设立社会影响评价体系构建与实践应用[J]. 国家公园(中英文), 2024, 2(3): 185-197. DOI: 10.20152/j.np.202310100013
引用本文: 宗路平, 赵文飞, 王梦君, 张天星, 尹志坚. 国家公园设立社会影响评价体系构建与实践应用[J]. 国家公园(中英文), 2024, 2(3): 185-197. DOI: 10.20152/j.np.202310100013
ZONG Luping, ZHAO Wenfei, WANG Mengjun, ZHANG Tianxing, YIN Zhijian. Construction and practical application of social impact assessment system for national park establishment[J]. NATIONAL PARK, 2024, 2(3): 185-197. DOI: 10.20152/j.np.202310100013
Citation: ZONG Luping, ZHAO Wenfei, WANG Mengjun, ZHANG Tianxing, YIN Zhijian. Construction and practical application of social impact assessment system for national park establishment[J]. NATIONAL PARK, 2024, 2(3): 185-197. DOI: 10.20152/j.np.202310100013

国家公园设立社会影响评价体系构建与实践应用

Construction and practical application of social impact assessment system for national park establishment

  • 摘要: 国家公园建设属于自然保护类公益性生态建设项目, 是典型的多元参与主体和激励相容, 关键在于协调各相关利益群体充分达成一致共识。基于我国国家公园体制建设特征, 从社会影响评价视角, 以滇藏两省(区)共建的高黎贡山国家公园为研究实例, 对国家公园建设产生的社会效益、社会效果预先做出评估, 客观分析可能产生的正、负面影响和利益相关者态度、社会影响程度, 以及识别潜在的社会风险。探讨符合国家公园设立的社会影响评价内容和指标体系, 以期从社会影响层面为后续国家公园的建设提供科学理论方法与案例借鉴。通过对高黎贡山国家公园设立的社会影响、社会互适性、社会风险、可持续性等进行分析评价, 结果显示:(1)与利益相关者在中等程度上相互促进;(2)有利于区域生态、经济、社会的全面协调与可持续发展;(3)与当地社会环境具有较强的相互适应性;(4)整体风险等级不高, 存在一般、较小社会风险因素, 通过采取针对性的规避和防范措施, 可有效化解;(5)通过制定科学合理的社会管理方案, 可增强国家公园建设与社会效果的可持续性。因此, 高黎贡山国家公园的设立社会影响正向, 社会风险可控, 利益相关者支持, 利大于弊, 项目能顺利实施。研究提出的国家公园设立社会影响评价体系符合我国国家公园建设实际, 具有较强的理论指引和实践推广。在实施过程中要注重考虑评价目标的多样性、多层次性和社会因素的差异性, 并着重强调利益相关者分析和社会风险评价。同时, 应基于确立的社会影响评价基础上, 开展多层次的保护管理政策调整优化。

     

    Abstract: The construction of national parks is a natural protection public welfare construction project, involving typical multi-participant and incentive compatibility. The key is coordinating all relevant interest groups to reach a complete consensus. This study is based on the characteristics of China′s national park system construction, from the perspective of social impact assessment, taking the cross-regional construction of Gaoligong Mountain National Park jointly built by Yunnan and Xizang. This study aims to evaluate the social benefits and impacts of constructing of national parks in advance, including the potential positive and negative effects, stakeholder attitudes, social impact, and the identification of possible social risks. Also, this study discusses the content and index system of social impact assessment in line with the establishment of cross-regional national parks to provide scientific theoretical methods and case references for the subsequent construction of cross-regional national parks from the perspective of social impact. The analysis and evaluation of the establishment of the Gaoligong Mountain National Park was conducted from aspects such as social impact, societal adaptability, social risk, and sustainability of the establishment of Gaoligong Mountain National Park. The results are as follows: (1) It promotes synergistic interactions with stakeholders at a moderate level. (2) It is conducive to the comprehensive coordination and sustainable development of regional ecology, economy and society. (3) It demonstrates strong adaptability with the local social environment. (4) The overall risk level is not high, with general or minor social risk factors present, which can be effectively mitigated through targeted preventive measures. (5) A scientifically sound social management plan can enhance the sustainability of national park construction and its social effects. Therefore, the establishment of Gaoligong Mountain National Park has larger positive social impacts, including controllable social risks, and stakeholder support, facilitating smooth implementation of the project. The social impact assessment system of national park establishment proposed in this paper aligns with actual construction of national parks in China, and offers strong theoretical guidance and practical promotion. During implementation, it is important to pay attention to the diversity and multi-level nature of assessment objectives, as well as differences in social factors. Emphasizing stakeholder analysis and social risk evaluation is vital. Additionally, it is recommended that adjustments and optimizations of protection management policies are made based on established social impact assessments.

     

/

返回文章
返回